History of Aquarion/WhyIHateYourAGMMotion

CLSWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website

Revision 7 . . (edit) December 31, 2010 4:21 pm by Aquarion
Revision 6 . . (edit) December 13, 2010 3:29 pm by Aquarion
Revision 2 . . April 24, 2010 12:03 am by Locksmith
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 5,17c5,17
[ ] Is almost perfect
[ ] Has a couple of issues
[ ] Would benefit from rewording
[ ] Would not enhance the game
[ ] Would be detrimental to the game
[ ] Would destroy the game
[ ] Would destroy the game and all the players
[ ] Would destroy larp itself
[ ] Would cause the entire city to be razed to the ground
[ ] Would destroy the planet
[ ] Would destroy the universe
[ ] Would destroy every universe
[ ] Kills kittens.
a [ ] Is almost perfect
b [ ] Has a couple of issues
c [ ] Would benefit from rewording
d [ ] Would not enhance the game
e [ ] Would be detrimental to the game
f [ ] Would destroy the game
g [ ] Would destroy the game and all the players
h [ ] Would destroy larp itself
i [ ] Would cause the entire city to be razed to the ground
j [ ] Would destroy the planet
k [ ] Would destroy the universe
l [ ] Would destroy every universe
m [ ] Kills kittens.

Changed: 21,69c21,73
[ ] Is unbalanced for _______ builds
[ ] Would render ________ useless
[ ] Appears to be balanced against a hypothetical situation that has never seen possibility
[ ] Appears to be balanced for a hypothetical society staffed entirely by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
[ ] Assumes that the existing society is staffed by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
[ ] Is attempting to balance against people with high hard [combat/organising/alchemy/mage] skills
[ ] Balances assuming DAC is the greatest thing in the entire game
[ ] Balances assuming DAC is the most useless concept in the entire game
[ ] Assumes everybody is playing for soap opera thrills
[ ] Assumes nobody cares about soap opera scenes
[ ] Assumes all builds in this class are munchkin-ed
[ ] Leaves newbie characters with no high level goal to aim for
[ ] Leaves high level characters unable to do anything
[ ] Is turning TT into Maelstrom
[ ] Entirely negates the purpose of the _______ system
[ ] Gives __________ too much direct damage
[ ] Destroys a large part of Narrativist players' ability to justify linearing
[ ] Destroys a large part of Simulationist players' reasons to justify linearing
[ ] Assumes everybody wants their characters to live until (one day before) retirement
[ ] Assumes that nobody minds if their characters die
[ ] Will take away character's ability to affect their own awesome death
[ ] Will make much harder to send NPCs of this type into the bar
[ ] Raises the barrier for minimum physrep too high
[ ] Assumes that everyone is fine with snaz
[ ] Is too much like another physrep
[ ] Cannot be physreped
[ ] Removes something from the system that could make unique monsters more easily stat-able
[ ] Rewards players for munchkining builds or time
[ ] Allows players to levelup characters that are never at risk
[ ] It would break character concepts
[ ] It would break major in-universe stuff
[ ] It removes Awesome from the system without giving anything in return
[ ] It removes the ability to ____________ from the system, which I think is worthwhile
[ ] It encourages players of a certain cast *not* to gain XP
[ ] It assumes the refs are omnipresent
[ ] It assumes the refs are useless
[ ] Removes random cool things the refs can do.
[ ] It takes away possible consequences of actions
[ ] Is pointless, as this already happens.
[ ] Causes the refs significantly more downtime overhead
[ ] Is another system that players have to keep track of in uptime
[ ] Is another factor that refs have to keep track of on linears
[ ] Means multi-classing is impossible
[ ] Means multi-classing is mandatory
[ ] Causes a huge gap where you can't buy skills at XP level _____
[ ] Causes a huge gap where all the skills you can buy at level _____ are useless
[ ] Breaks with a ______________ build
[ ] Breaks if brought in in tandem with a ______ build
[ ] Sucks too much for mere tickboxes to convey.
01 [ ] Is unbalanced for _______ builds
02 [ ] Would render ________ useless
03 [ ] Appears to be balanced against a hypothetical situation that has never seen possibility
04 [ ] Appears to be balanced for a hypothetical society staffed entirely by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
05 [ ] Assumes that the existing society is staffed by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
06 [ ] Is attempting to balance against people with high hard [combat/organising/alchemy/mage] skills
07 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the greatest thing in the entire game
08 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the most useless concept in the entire game
09 [ ] Assumes everybody is playing for soap opera thrills
10 [ ] Assumes nobody cares about soap opera scenes
11 [ ] Assumes all builds in this class are munchkin-ed
12 [ ] Leaves newbie characters with no high level goal to aim for
13 [ ] Leaves high level characters unable to do anything
14 [ ] Is turning TT into Maelstrom
15 [ ] Is turning TT into World of Warcraft
16 [ ] Entirely negates the purpose of the _______ system
17 [ ] Gives __________ too much direct damage
18 [ ] Destroys a large part of Narrativist players' ability to justify linearing
19 [ ] Destroys a large part of Simulationist players' reasons to justify linearing
20 [ ] Assumes everybody wants their characters to live until (one day before) retirement
21 [ ] Assumes that nobody minds if their characters die
22 [ ] Will take away character's ability to affect their own awesome death
23 [ ] Will make much harder to send NPCs of this type into the bar
24 [ ] Raises the barrier for minimum physrep too high
25 [ ] Assumes that everyone is fine with snaz
26 [ ] Is too much like another physrep
27 [ ] Cannot be physreped
28 [ ] Removes something from the system that could make unique monsters more easily stat-able
29 [ ] Rewards players for munchkining builds or time
30 [ ] Allows players to levelup characters that are never at risk
31 [ ] It would break character concepts
32 [ ] It would break major in-universe stuff
33 [ ] It removes Awesome from the system without giving anything in return
34 [ ] It removes the ability to ____________ from the system, which I think is worthwhile
35 [ ] It encourages players of a certain cast *not* to gain XP
36 [ ] It assumes the refs are omnipresent
37 [ ] It assumes the refs are useless
38 [ ] Removes random cool things the refs can do.
39 [ ] It takes away possible consequences of actions
40 [ ] Is pointless, as this already happens.
41 [ ] Causes the refs significantly more downtime overhead
42 [ ] Is another system that players have to keep track of in uptime
43 [ ] Is another factor that refs have to keep track of on linears
44 [ ] Means multi-classing is impossible
45 [ ] Means multi-classing is mandatory
46 [ ] Causes a huge gap where you can't buy skills at XP level _____
47 [ ] Causes a huge gap where all the skills you can buy at level _____ are useless
48 [ ] Breaks with a ______________ build
49 [ ] Breaks if brought in in tandem with a ______ build
50 [ ] Was just rewritten last term
51 [ ] Was proposed and voted down last term
52 [ ] Appears to relegate skill trees to combat support
00 [ ] Sucks too much for mere tickboxes to convey.

Changed: 71c75
Please do not take this personally, as but I don't believe your proposal will add more to the game than it removes. Please
Please do not take this personally, but I don't believe your proposal will add more to the game than it removes. Please

Changed: 73,77c77,81
[ ] Die in a fire
[ ] Have a nice day
[ ] Respond with why I'm missing something
[ ] Don't hit me
[ ] Go screw your mother
i [ ] Die in a fire
ii [ ] Have a nice day
iii [ ] Respond with why I'm missing something
iv [ ] Don't hit me
v [ ] Go screw your mother

Changed: 81,83c85,87
[ ] Sincerely
[ ] Faithfully
[ ] With deep and abiding resentment
x [ ] Sincerely
y [ ] Faithfully
z [ ] With deep and abiding resentment

Changed: 89c93
::Yeah, I can get behind this :) --Locksmith Also, *hugs*.
::Yeah, I can get behind this :) --Locksmith Also, *hugs*.

CLSWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website
Search: