Aquarion/WhyIHateYourAGMMotion

CLSWiki | Aquarion | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website

Dear submitter:

I find it quite hard to be argumentative in a long term sniping war, and absolutely hate trying to have discussions over a wiki, therefore I am submitting this passive-aggressive note to attempt to explain my position. In short, I believe that your motion ______________

 a [ ] Is almost perfect
 b [ ] Has a couple of issues
 c [ ] Would benefit from rewording
 d [ ] Would not enhance the game
 e [ ] Would be detrimental to the game
 f [ ] Would destroy the game
 g [ ] Would destroy the game and all the players
 h [ ] Would destroy larp itself
 i [ ] Would cause the entire city to be razed to the ground
 j [ ] Would destroy the planet
 k [ ] Would destroy the universe
 l [ ] Would destroy every universe
 m [ ] Kills kittens.

Specifically, your proposal:

 01 [ ] Is unbalanced for _______ builds
 02 [ ] Would render ________ useless
 03 [ ] Appears to be balanced against a hypothetical situation that has never seen possibility
 04 [ ] Appears to be balanced for a hypothetical society staffed entirely by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
 05 [ ] Assumes that the existing society is staffed by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
 06 [ ] Is attempting to balance against people with high hard [combat/organising/alchemy/mage] skills
 07 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the greatest thing in the entire game
 08 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the most useless concept in the entire game
 09 [ ] Assumes everybody is playing for soap opera thrills
 10 [ ] Assumes nobody cares about soap opera scenes
 11 [ ] Assumes all builds in this class are munchkin-ed
 12 [ ] Leaves newbie characters with no high level goal to aim for
 13 [ ] Leaves high level characters unable to do anything
 14 [ ] Is turning TT into Maelstrom
 15 [ ] Is turning TT into World of Warcraft
 16 [ ] Entirely negates the purpose of the _______ system
 17 [ ] Gives __________ too much direct damage
 18 [ ] Destroys a large part of Narrativist players' ability to justify linearing
 19 [ ] Destroys a large part of Simulationist players' reasons to justify linearing
 20 [ ] Assumes everybody wants their characters to live until (one day before) retirement
 21 [ ] Assumes that nobody minds if their characters die
 22 [ ] Will take away character's ability to affect their own awesome death
 23 [ ] Will make much harder to send NPCs of this type into the bar
 24 [ ] Raises the barrier for minimum physrep too high
 25 [ ] Assumes that everyone is fine with snaz
 26 [ ] Is too much like another physrep
 27 [ ] Cannot be physreped
 28 [ ] Removes something from the system that could make unique monsters more easily stat-able
 29 [ ] Rewards players for munchkining builds or time
 30 [ ] Allows players to levelup characters that are never at risk
 31 [ ] It would break character concepts
 32 [ ] It would break major in-universe stuff
 33 [ ] It removes Awesome from the system without giving anything in return
 34 [ ] It removes the ability to ____________ from the system, which I think is worthwhile
 35 [ ] It encourages players of a certain cast *not* to gain XP
 36 [ ] It assumes the refs are omnipresent
 37 [ ] It assumes the refs are useless
 38 [ ] Removes random cool things the refs can do.
 39 [ ] It takes away possible consequences of actions
 40 [ ] Is pointless, as this already happens.
 41 [ ] Causes the refs significantly more downtime overhead
 42 [ ] Is another system that players have to keep track of in uptime
 43 [ ] Is another factor that refs have to keep track of on linears
 44 [ ] Means multi-classing is impossible
 45 [ ] Means multi-classing is mandatory
 46 [ ] Causes a huge gap where you can't buy skills at XP level _____
 47 [ ] Causes a huge gap where all the skills you can buy at level _____ are useless
 48 [ ] Breaks with a ______________ build
 49 [ ] Breaks if brought in in tandem with a ______ build
 50 [ ] Was just rewritten last term
 51 [ ] Was proposed and voted down last term
 52 [ ] Appears to relegate skill trees to combat support
 00 [ ] Sucks too much for mere tickboxes to convey.

Please do not take this personally, but I don't believe your proposal will add more to the game than it removes. Please

 i   [ ] Die in a fire
 ii  [ ] Have a nice day
 iii [ ] Respond with why I'm missing something
 iv  [ ] Don't hit me
 v   [ ] Go screw your mother

Yours

 x [ ] Sincerely
 y [ ] Faithfully
 z [ ] With deep and abiding resentment

 ____________________
 (Your name here)

Yeah, I can get behind this :) --Locksmith Also, *hugs*.

CLSWiki | Aquarion | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited December 31, 2010 4:21 pm by Aquarion (diff)
Search: