Aquarion/WhyIHateYourAGMMotion

CLSWiki | Aquarion | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website

Showing revision 2
Dear submitter:

I find it quite hard to be argumentative in a long term sniping war, and absolutely hate trying to have discussions over a wiki, therefore I am submitting this passive-aggressive note to attempt to explain my position. In short, I believe that your motion ______________

 [ ] Is almost perfect
 [ ] Has a couple of issues
 [ ] Would benefit from rewording
 [ ] Would not enhance the game
 [ ] Would be detrimental to the game
 [ ] Would destroy the game
 [ ] Would destroy the game and all the players
 [ ] Would destroy larp itself
 [ ] Would cause the entire city to be razed to the ground
 [ ] Would destroy the planet
 [ ] Would destroy the universe
 [ ] Would destroy every universe
 [ ] Kills kittens.

Specifically, your proposal:

 [ ] Is unbalanced for _______ builds
 [ ] Would render ________ useless
 [ ] Appears to be balanced against a hypothetical situation that has never seen possibility
 [ ] Appears to be balanced for a hypothetical society staffed entirely by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
 [ ] Assumes that the existing society is staffed by munchkining, obnoxious jerks
 [ ] Is attempting to balance against people with high hard [combat/organising/alchemy/mage] skills
 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the greatest thing in the entire game
 [ ] Balances assuming DAC is the most useless concept in the entire game
 [ ] Assumes everybody is playing for soap opera thrills
 [ ] Assumes nobody cares about soap opera scenes
 [ ] Assumes all builds in this class are munchkin-ed
 [ ] Leaves newbie characters with no high level goal to aim for
 [ ] Leaves high level characters unable to do anything
 [ ] Is turning TT into Maelstrom
 [ ] Entirely negates the purpose of the _______ system
 [ ] Gives __________ too much direct damage
 [ ] Destroys a large part of Narrativist players' ability to justify linearing
 [ ] Destroys a large part of Simulationist players' reasons to justify linearing
 [ ] Assumes everybody wants their characters to live until (one day before) retirement
 [ ] Assumes that nobody minds if their characters die
 [ ] Will take away character's ability to affect their own awesome death
 [ ] Will make much harder to send NPCs of this type into the bar
 [ ] Raises the barrier for minimum physrep too high
 [ ] Assumes that everyone is fine with snaz
 [ ] Is too much like another physrep
 [ ] Cannot be physreped
 [ ] Removes something from the system that could make unique monsters more easily stat-able
 [ ] Rewards players for munchkining builds or time
 [ ] Allows players to levelup characters that are never at risk
 [ ] It would break character concepts
 [ ] It would break major in-universe stuff
 [ ] It removes Awesome from the system without giving anything in return
 [ ] It removes the ability to ____________ from the system, which I think is worthwhile
 [ ] It encourages players of a certain cast *not* to gain XP
 [ ] It assumes the refs are omnipresent
 [ ] It assumes the refs are useless
 [ ] Removes random cool things the refs can do.
 [ ] It takes away possible consequences of actions
 [ ] Is pointless, as this already happens.
 [ ] Causes the refs significantly more downtime overhead
 [ ] Is another system that players have to keep track of in uptime
 [ ] Is another factor that refs have to keep track of on linears
 [ ] Means multi-classing is impossible
 [ ] Means multi-classing is mandatory
 [ ] Causes a huge gap where you can't buy skills at XP level _____
 [ ] Causes a huge gap where all the skills you can buy at level _____ are useless
 [ ] Breaks with a ______________ build
 [ ] Breaks if brought in in tandem with a ______ build
 [ ] Sucks too much for mere tickboxes to convey.

Please do not take this personally, as but I don't believe your proposal will add more to the game than it removes. Please

 [ ] Die in a fire
 [ ] Have a nice day
 [ ] Respond with why I'm missing something
 [ ] Don't hit me
 [ ] Go screw your mother

Yours

 [ ] Sincerely
 [ ] Faithfully
 [ ] With deep and abiding resentment

 ____________________
 (Your name here)

Yeah, I can get behind this :) --Locksmith Also, *hugs*.

CLSWiki | Aquarion | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited April 24, 2010 12:03 am by Locksmith (diff)
Search: