AGM2018

CLSWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website

Showing revision 29
Please note that this AGM plan has been copied off SystemReset/Easter13AGMAgenda and modified to suit this year's needs. If any sections are missing, please contact the exec:

Date: 9th of March, 2018

Time: Before the Interactive, as quickly as possible

1) Treasurer's Report

Accounts can be found at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VjwZ0YIWww0oVBVq7IjTIaUtrVd1xWro59o6qfKfS-s/edit?usp=sharing

The UCH has raised their price by £8 per session. An extra £160/year may mean we need to look elsewhere after all, sadly.

2) President's Report

3) New System Vote

List of proposed systems:

3a) A short pitch from each system writer

3b) Q&A

3c) Then Vote

4) Appointment of Committee:

Further nominations for exec positions can be taken up to and including during the meeting itself.

5) Appointment of next year's Referee Team:

6) Other Motions:

0) EXAMPLE MOTION

We propose that all motions written on this page should follow the format of this example motion.

Reasoning: This will keep the motions relatively neat.

Comment: This motion PASSED/FAILED at the AGM

1) Interactive Day

A discussion of whether Fridays are still the best day for interactives, possibly followed by a motion to change it if we decide it's a good idea.

Reasoning: The player base has changed makeup quite a bit since interactives were placed on Fridays. Is Friday still the best day to hold interactives? In particular, is taking up their Friday nights a reason for our less than stellar retention of students?

2) Minor generalisations of the E&D Policy

The current policy contains some wording specific to the current system (for example it names "Breaking Worlds" as the society system). Generalise these terms to apply to any system we run.

3) Extend E&D Policy to exclude roleplaying effects similar to mental illness

Add "We will not include mental roleplaying effects that parody real-world mental illness."

4) Add OC requirement to drop a subject to the E&D policy

Add "If someone indicates OC to you that a topic is making them uncomfortable then you should stop mentioning it. It is always acceptable to drop OC to remove yourself from a scene that's making you uncomfortable."

Reasoning: I believe we've been doing this already. It's arguably implied by "should not experience pressure to ... engage when they do not wish to", but I think it can use spelling out.

5) We should have an accessibility statement.

Reasoning: This makes it clearer what our games involve, especially because club larp has a reputation for being miserable if you can't fight. I wrote a draft statement for nitpicking here: Pufferfish/DraftAccessibilityStatement

7) Any Other Business

8) Rejoice!


Discussion


CLSWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences | Main Website
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited March 5, 2018 6:41 pm by Gabriel (diff)
Search: